#1 - OUR ONE DEATH AND OUR SAVIOR’S ONE SACRIFICE

Series: Easter 2023
April 02, 2023 | Don Horban
References: Hebrews 9:25-28Luke 16:27- 31Romans 1:21, 32
Topics: New TestamentDeathThe CrossJudgmentSinJesus ChristEasterSecond ComingResurrectionSaviour

Subscribe to our YouTube channel

#1 - OUR ONE DEATH AND OUR SAVIOR’S ONE SACRIFICE


OUR ONE DEATH AND OUR SAVIOR’S ONE SACRIFICE

Hebrews 9:27-28 - “And just as it is appointed for man to die once, and after that comes judgment, [28] so Christ, having been offered once to bear the sins of many, will appear a second time, not to deal with sin but to save those who are eagerly waiting for him.”

We all know we die. And we all know Jesus died. But our text seems to add needless words in describing these events. The writer doesn’t just say we die. He labors the point that we only die once. And the writer doesn’t just tell us Jesus died. He says Jesus died only once. So, in spite of the fact that it seems unnecessary to do so, we should at least investigate the possibility that our text must have some reason for this approach.

In fact, I think the wording of these two verses gives us a clue as to how to interpret them. Verse 27 introduces the need for verse 28. And verse 28 answers to the situation sited in verse 27. All of this is made clear by the way the writer launches his thoughts with the words “And just as....” in verse 27. He makes it clear that he’s not just giving a list of ideas, but is building a case, an argument, in which the two events of the first verse are somehow provided for in the two events in the second.

So the approach of our text is: “just as” these things happened, so these other things happened in response to them. They’re related as cause and effect, as need and solution. Certain things are appointed to man. They are unavoidable and they are hugely problematic. And these things are the reason Christ came the first time and will come a second time.

This is made even more pronounced by the careful and deliberate use of the time words in these verses. Notice, it is appointed for man to die “once”(27). And, not coincidentally, Christ, has been offered “once”(28). Then, just as after our one death another event follows logically on its heels - “....and after that comes judgment....”(27) - so after Christ’s one sacrifice there logically follows another event - .... [Christ] will appear a second time, not to deal with sin but to save those who are eagerly waiting for him”(28).

1) IT IS APPOINTED FOR MAN TO DIE ONCE, AND AFTER THAT COMES JUDGMENT

This simple observation is troubling to a lot of reflective people. There are few things more difficult to accept than the idea that so short a time of human trial and probation should lead to so lengthy a time of judgement and reckoning. We are placed on earth, however long we live, for just a few short years and yet we are told the consequences of our actions in those short years extend for all eternity.

This seems to many to be a disproportionate justice. And for some it leads to increased personal indulgence in sin, with the assumption that God couldn’t possibly bring eternal damnation on anyone for the fleeting moments of indiscretion in this all-to-brief present earthly life.

And yet our text seems pointed and clear. If words mean anything at all, and if God’s decree is given any plain weight, it is starkly stated that “....it is appointed for man to die once, and after that comes judgment....”(27). So there is no probationary period extending after this life. We die only once. Death doesn’t usher in another chance at earthly life, or some other time for improvement. Following this life, and before anything else, there is judgment for our earthly pilgrimage.

But what if there was another chance? I’m sure many are inclined to think if only we had just one more period of probation we would enter the second trial more carefully. What if instead of dying once we all died twice? Surely we would give God more careful attention if we all had a second go around. If we could enter a second period of probation on this earth carrying all the experience of the first heaven would, we think, end up much more densely populated. The heavenly throng would swell.

And surely, if God were truly loving and gracious and, indeed, as the Bible says, “not wanting any to perish” then why would His love not manifest itself in this particular way? Why would it not be “appointed unto man twice to die?” On the surface this seems to be a good question.

After all, even those who hadn’t yet died even once would have the benefit of testimony from those who had already tasted the first death, seen the reality of the eternal world, and could now tell others of the need for holiness, without which, no one will see the Lord. Surely this would turn the careless from their wayward ways and bring a deeper attention and devotion to the Lord.

But would it? We already have striking teaching from our Lord in the rich man’s request to Abraham to answer this question: Luke 16:27- 31 - “And he said, 'Then I beg you, father, to send him to my father's house— [28] for I have five brothers —so that he may warn them, lest they also come into this place of torment.' [29] But Abraham said, 'They have Moses and the Prophets; let them hear them.' [30] And he said, 'No, father Abraham, but if someone goes to them from the dead, they will repent.' [31] He said to him, 'If they do not hear Moses and the Prophets, neither will they be convinced if someone should rise from the dead.' "

Note well, “....if someone comes back from the dead!” They won’t listen even if someone they knew had been dead - a member of their own family - someone whose funeral they probably attended - returned with a message of warning of judgment to come. Not even the verified testimony of their own deceased brother can soften a sinful heart. So no, we know it isn’t true that those who hadn’t died once would be turned from their sin by those who were on their second time around. The Bible says so.

“Well that may be, Pastor Don. But it doesn’t settle it. Surely those who had already died once and were on their second chance - surely these would devout themselves to Christ. At least we would eventually get everyone to smarten up, even if it took dying once to bring them around!”

But this too is unlikely. It’s unlikely because of the effect of sin on the person committing it. Sin not only brings guilt. It brings, just as surely as it brings guilt, moral blindness and entropy. It removes the capacity of repentance as surely as water removes the life from a fire.

This is something every person needs to reconsider: Romans 1:21 and 32 - “For although they knew God, they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened....32....Though they know God's decree that those who practice such things deserve to die, they not only do them but give approval to those who practice them.”

Three steps cry out for notice. Their hearts are “darkened”(21), they “know God’s decree”(32), and they encourage deeper sin and disobedience, even in others (32). This is more than merely being lured into sin. This is active rebellion against sin with the full knowledge of its consequences. This is challenging God’s moral compass.

But there’s more. We all know from our one life that the chances of repentance diminish the longer sin is justified. When do any of us find sin easier to forsake - with its very first commitment or after years of repeated willful indulgence? And if someone lived his whole lifeknowing it was appointed unto man twice to die, who would willingly forsake sin in his first time around? Sin’s hold would deepen beyond words as we all procrastinated, planning for a second chance after our first death.

You see, if the second period of probation is to have even the appearance of an advantage then we would have to have memory of the first life and the scene of judgment at its close. After all, this is what is alleged to cause carefulness the second time around.

But that consciousness of the first life would also be our undoing. It means the second season of probation would be entered not only with the fallen nature with which we all enter the first, but also with a conscience already hardened through the baggage of an entire life of sinful practice. Desires and habits would emerge fully formed. So however hard it was to forsake sin in the first life, it would be infinitely more difficult to forsake it in the second.

The second probationary period would be lived with moral senses even more blunted than the first. And the prospect of another entire second life, with our fallen assumption that it would be as full and long as the first, would bring its own tendency toward deeper procrastination and more arrogant carelessness.

So we are beholding not the unreasonableness of God in decreeing we all die but once. It is nothing but His wisdom and His compassion. The effects of sin are put on a shorter leash. We are told in advance we must live this life with devotion and earnestness. In advance we are told in love it is appointed once to die and after then comes the judgment. The preciousness of each single day encourages us to invest each one with eternal significance.

2) JUST AS WE DIE ONLY ONCE SO CHRIST WAS OFFERED ONLY ONCE TO BEAR THE SINS OF MANY

Again, the writer labors to use the same singular reference to Christ’s sacrificial death as to our own - Hebrews 9:27-28 - “And just as it is appointed for man to die once, and after that comes judgement, [28] so Christ, having been offered once to bear the sins of many, will appear a second time, not to deal with sin but to save those who are eagerly waiting for him.”

The first part of this sequence we’ve already studied. The awful fact of death is made so final in that we only do it once. There is no escape from this appointment. So serious is sin and so relentless is its grip that it drags all down equally and finally to the grave.

And it’s precisely to shift our attention from our one death’s finality and certainty that the apostle uses the very same term to describe Christ’s death on our behalf - “....having been offered once to bear the sins of many....”(28). He need not die again to bring forgiveness and payment for those sins that drag us all down to the grave. And those sins are the very root and power of death.

There is something precious here. If Christ died to bring an end to sin’s reign, and if in His death He not only brought forgiveness for my guilt but actually conquered the power of death, and if He offered this sacrifice only once, then there is nothing else to be done to save us all not only from sin and guilt but also from the grave.

Imagine, the Father’s heart - our Creator’s heart - more full of loving concern than any could ever imagine - that heart, that would have done absolutely anything - and would have gladly done it a thousand times had it been necessary- could think of not one more thing to do to deliver us from sin and death.

This is, in fact, the writer’s whole argument in this great chapter of Hebrews - Hebrews 9:25-26 - “Nor was it to offer himself repeatedly, as the high priest enters the holy places every year with blood not his own, [26] for then he would have had to suffer repeatedly since the foundation of the world. But as it is, he has appeared once for all at the end of the ages to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself.”

3) PEOPLE WHO UNDERSTAND THIS ARE EAGERLY WAITING FOR JESUS TO COME BACK TO EARTH A SECOND TIME

Hebrews 9:28b - “....so Christ, having been offered once to bear the sins of many, will appear a second time, not to deal with sin but to save those who are eagerly waiting for him.”

With all my heart I believe the church is right on the edge of abandoning what the New Testament calls the “blessed hope” - the triumphant Second Coming of Jesus Christ back to this earth. And please note that last sentence. I fear - and this fear is reinforced at the vast majority of Christian funerals I witness - that we center more on our dying and going to be with Jesus than on Jesus coming back to this earth.

True enough, and precious through and through, is the teaching that those who die in the Lord go to be with Jesus - “which is far better.” And yes, “absent from the body is present with the Lord.” But that’s not what I’m living for and yearning for.

Here’s why. My dying and going to be with Jesus - as wonderful as that is - does nothing to rid this world of sin and rebellion. My dying and going to be with Jesus does nothing to bring this whole Christ- rejecting world to its knees and acknowledge my Jesus as God the Son, King of kings and Lord of lords. My dying and going to be with Jesus does nothing to undo the Fall and the rule of Satan, and war and hatred and disease and the bondage of a thousand false religions. And I long for all those things!

What I’m longing for is God’s finished work of new creation. I’m waiting for a new heaven and a new earth wherein dwells righteousness. And I’m longing for life in a resurrected, glorious body - one just like the risen body of Jesus Christ. And that’s what Jesus is coming back to do.

The Second Coming of Christ used to be talked about a lot more than it is today. And I want this church to help change that. The Second Coming of Jesus Christ isn’t the same as the Christian’s death. It’s better - way better. Remember, we don’t just believe in life after death. We’re waiting and longing for the life after life after death!